Comments on: an alternate(elegant) solution http://www.hammerofcode.com/2008/05/an-alternateelegant-solution/ >>me.become!(:ruby_developer) Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:39:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Mithro http://www.hammerofcode.com/2008/05/an-alternateelegant-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Mithro Thu, 08 May 2008 04:58:52 +0000 http://www.hammerofcode.com/?p=12#comment-9 I am thinking that you won't actually have "movement" where objects in the map move, instead each territory should have attack/reinforce/etc orders. Units are not "real" objects but properties of territories. The links would just be to provide graphical information about where attacks could occur. I'm on a +9:30 timezone at the moment, so it may be a little hard to catch up with me. Your last ping was at 2:30 in the morning! :) You can always try email but I think interactive chat will probably be more fruitful. The constellations idea sounds pretty cool, that is not something I would have thought of. I am thinking that you won’t actually have “movement” where objects in the map move, instead each territory should have attack/reinforce/etc orders. Units are not “real” objects but properties of territories. The links would just be to provide graphical information about where attacks could occur.

I’m on a +9:30 timezone at the moment, so it may be a little hard to catch up with me. Your last ping was at 2:30 in the morning! :) You can always try email but I think interactive chat will probably be more fruitful.

The constellations idea sounds pretty cool, that is not something I would have thought of.

]]>